Reviewer Guidelines
In order to provide readers with free access to worthwhile scientific research, AJMAS founded its Open Access journal. All of the content that we publish at AJMAS is held to the highest academic standards. Before a manuscript is finally accepted for publication, the peer review process is intended to evaluate its originality, validity, and general quality.
Reviewers contribute to the integrity of the publishing process by preventing the publication of works that are plagiarized, of low quality, or otherwise inappropriate.
The Reviewer
Peer review is essential for preserving the caliber and reliability of academic and scientific research. AJMAS wholeheartedly endorses the peer review procedure and values the contributions that reviewers make to a journal's accomplishments. Reviewers are chosen based on their expertise in their respective fields, and depending on how much they contribute to their journal, they might be offered a more prestigious position. Before a manuscript is accepted for final publication, reviewers are tasked with giving it honest feedback and criticism.
The Peer review process
Peer review is double-blind in AJMAS journal. When manuscript is accepted for peer review, neither the reviewers nor the authors are made aware of the author's name, contact information, or affiliations. Each manuscript is evaluated for accuracy, originality, and completion by reviewers.
Some Important Notes